2Slidesロゴ
Preview

Maruti Suzuki Q2 FY27 Earnings Presentation

16 スライド

収録コレクション: 投資家向けプレゼン資料の実例 · インド企業のIR資料 実例集

Maruti Suzuki India Q2 FY27 and H1 FY27 standalone financial results presentation (27 October 2026), filed with BSE/NSE: sales volume, net sales, operating EBITDA/EBIT, PBT and PAT versus Q2 FY26, Q1 FY27 and H1 FY26, key cost ratios as a percentage of net sales, margin drivers, and domestic/export and segment-wise vehicle sales volumes.

4 いいね
0 ダウンロード

このスライドの表紙をスタイルの参考にして、ご自身の内容からスライドを作成します。 下のページから好きな1枚を選び、そのレイアウトを参考にすることもできます。

クイックナビゲーション

タグ

Maruti Suzuki
Maruti Suzuki India
Q2 FY27 results
H1 FY27
Earnings presentation

スライドを共有

説明

メイントピック

Maruti Suzuki India Q2 FY27 and H1 FY27 standalone financial results presentation (27 October 2026), filed with BSE/NSE: sales volume, net sales, operating EBITDA/EBIT, PBT and PAT versus Q2 FY26, Q1 FY27 and H1 FY26, key cost ratios as a percentage of net sales, margin drivers, and domestic/export and segment-wise vehicle sales volumes.

主な利点

  • •Complete 16-page Indian earnings deck filed with BSE/NSE, with every figure in INR million exactly as reported
  • •Shows a clear volume-vs-margin story: Q2 FY27 sales volume up 26.5% YoY to 696,654 units and net sales up 26.1% to INR 506,155 million, while PAT fell 26.9% to INR 24,149 million
  • •Three parallel comparison blocks (YoY quarter, QoQ quarter, half-year YoY) built on the same highlights table, ratio table and margin-factors slide
  • •Segment volume table splits domestic sales into passenger cars, UVs, vans, LCV and sales to other OEMs with growth and mix
  • •Available as the original PDF plus an editable PPTX converted from the PDF

ターゲットオーディエンス

  • •Equity analysts and investors covering Indian automakers and the Nifty Auto universe
  • •Finance students learning how Indian listed companies present quarterly standalone results
  • •Investor relations teams designing a lean, table-driven results deck
  • •Consultants and strategists tracking India's passenger vehicle and utility vehicle market

使用例

  • •Reference for Maruti Suzuki's Q2 FY27 (July–September 2026) and H1 FY27 (April–September 2026) performance
  • •Template for a quarterly results deck with YoY, QoQ and half-year comparison sections
  • •Teaching example of margin bridge commentary (negative vs positive factors) next to a basis-point ratio table
  • •Benchmarking automaker cost structure: material cost, employee cost and other expenses as % of net sales

独自の価値提案

  • •Restated comparatives after the amalgamation of Suzuki Motor Gujarat (SMG) into Maruti Suzuki India, appointed date 1 April 2025
  • •Explicit red/green arrow convention marking adverse vs favourable ratio movement in basis points
  • •Names the drivers behind the margin squeeze: commodity prices linked to the West Asia conflict, adverse forex and mark-to-market losses on invested surplus
  • •Minimal corporate template (white background, gold frame lines, green titles, yellow table headers) that is easy to reuse

スライドページ (16)

レイアウト、主要コンテンツ、視覚要素を含む各スライドページの詳細ビュー。

ページ 1
Title slide

Maruti Suzuki India Limited – Q2 FY'27 and H1 FY'27 Standalone Financial Results

コンテンツ

Cover slide with the Maruti Suzuki logo, company name, the subtitle 'Q2 FY'27 and H1 FY'27 Standalone Financial Results' and the date 27th October 2026.

レイアウト構造

Right-aligned title block: logo top right, large green company name under a gold frame line, subtitle and date lower right above a gold rule; generous white space on the left.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Red and blue Maruti Suzuki logo
  • •Gold bracket-style frame lines
  • •Dark green bold title text
  • •Date line
ページ 2
Disclaimer

Safe Harbour

コンテンツ

Forward-looking statements disclaimer: actual results may differ materially due to risks and uncertainties; the company undertakes no obligation to update the statements, which should be read with the risks the company faces.

レイアウト構造

Standard content layout: green title top left inside a gold corner bracket, one justified paragraph across the slide width, gold rule at the bottom and page number.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Green slide title
  • •Justified paragraph text
  • •Gold corner bracket and bottom rule
ページ 3
Agenda

Contents

コンテンツ

Agenda in four sections: Q2 FY'27 vs Q2 FY'26, Q2 FY'27 vs Q1 FY'27 and H1 FY'27 vs H1 FY'26 (each with a ratio comparison), then Sales Volume. A note explains that Suzuki Motor Gujarat (SMG), a wholly owned subsidiary, amalgamated with MSIL from 1 December 2025 with an appointed date of 1 April 2025, so prior periods are restated; footnotes state all figures are in INR million except sales volume and ratios, and ratios may be approximate due to rounding.

レイアウト構造

Numbered list with gold numerals and green arrow sub-bullets, an italic bold-labelled note block at the bottom and two small footnotes beneath the gold rule.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Gold numbered list
  • •Arrow sub-bullets
  • •Italic amalgamation note
  • •Footnotes on units
ページ 4
Section divider

Section Divider: Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q2 FY'26

コンテンツ

Section break introducing the year-on-year quarter comparison of Q2 FY'27 against Q2 FY'26.

レイアウト構造

Centered three-line text stack ('Q2 FY'27 / w.r.t. / Q2 FY'26') inside the gold frame lines.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Centered large text
  • •Gold corner bracket and bottom rule
ページ 5
Financial highlights / KPI table

Highlights of Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q2 FY'26

コンテンツ

Sales volume 696,654 vs 550,874 units (+26.5%); net sales INR 506,155 million vs 401,358 million (+26.1%); operating EBITDA 47,633 vs 50,848 (-6.3%); operating EBIT 28,037 vs 33,820 (-17.1%); PBT 31,658 vs 42,909 (-26.2%); PAT 24,149 vs 33,028 (-26.9%). Figures except sales volume are in INR million.

レイアウト構造

Three-column table (metric, Q2 FY'27, Q2 FY'26) with a yellow header row, and a separate column of percentage changes with green up arrows or red down arrows to the right.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Yellow header table
  • •Green up arrows for growth
  • •Red down arrows for declines
  • •Unit note above table
ページ 6
Data table / ratio comparison

Key Financial Ratios (% of Net Sales) – Q2 FY'27 vs Q2 FY'26

コンテンツ

Material cost 79.9% vs 75.7% (+420 bps); employee cost 4.6% vs 5.1% (-50); other expenses 11.5% vs 12.0% (-50); other operating income 5.4% vs 5.5% (-10); operating EBITDA margin 9.4% vs 12.7% (-330); depreciation 3.9% vs 4.2% (-40); operating EBIT 5.5% vs 8.4% (-290); interest 0.1% unchanged; non-operating income 0.8% vs 2.4% (-160); PBT 6.3% vs 10.7% (-440); PAT 4.8% vs 8.2% (-340).

レイアウト構造

Four-column ratio table (parameter, current, prior, change in bps) with yellow header, Op. EBITDA and PAT rows highlighted in yellow, and red/green arrows beside each change; colour legend at bottom left.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Highlighted EBITDA and PAT rows
  • •Basis-point change column
  • •Red/green directional arrows
  • •Colour legend
ページ 7
Analysis / margin bridge commentary

Financial Analysis of Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q2 FY'26

コンテンツ

Key reasons for margin movement. Negative factors: adverse commodity prices in the context of the West Asia conflict, adverse foreign exchange movement, lower non-operating income due to mark-to-market losses on invested surplus. Positive factors: improved realization, favourable operating leverage, cost reduction efforts.

レイアウト構造

Text slide with a bold 'Key reasons for margin movement' lead-in, then two bold sub-headings (Negative Factors, Positive Factors) each followed by gold square bullets.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Gold square bullets
  • •Negative vs positive factor grouping
  • •Green title
ページ 8
Section divider

Section Divider: Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q1 FY'27

コンテンツ

Section break introducing the sequential (quarter-on-quarter) comparison of Q2 FY'27 against Q1 FY'27.

レイアウト構造

Centered three-line text stack inside the gold frame lines, identical to the other dividers.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Centered large text
  • •Gold frame lines
ページ 9
Financial highlights / KPI table

Highlights of Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q1 FY'27

コンテンツ

Sales volume 696,654 vs 682,724 units (+2.0%); net sales INR 506,155 million vs 499,591 million (+1.3%); operating EBITDA 47,633 vs 43,111 (+10.5%); operating EBIT 28,037 vs 25,311 (+10.8%); PBT 31,658 vs 43,413 (-27.1%); PAT 24,149 vs 33,521 (-28.0%).

レイアウト構造

Same highlights table design as page 5 with yellow header and green/red arrow change column.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Yellow header table
  • •Four green up arrows
  • •Two red down arrows on PBT and PAT
ページ 10
Data table / ratio comparison

Key Financial Ratios (% of Net Sales) – Q2 FY'27 vs Q1 FY'27

コンテンツ

Material cost 79.9% vs 80.5% (-60 bps); employee cost 4.6% vs 4.9% (-30); other expenses 11.5% vs 11.0% (+50); other operating income 5.4% vs 5.0% (+40); operating EBITDA 9.4% vs 8.6% (+80); depreciation 3.9% vs 3.6% (+30); operating EBIT 5.5% vs 5.1% (+40); interest 0.1% unchanged; non-operating income 0.8% vs 3.7% (-290); PBT 6.3% vs 8.7% (-240); PAT 4.8% vs 6.7% (-190).

レイアウト構造

Ratio table matching page 6, with highlighted EBITDA and PAT rows, bps change column and red/green arrows plus legend.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Highlighted rows
  • •Mixed green and red arrows
  • •Colour legend
ページ 11
Analysis / margin bridge commentary

Financial Analysis of Q2 FY'27 w.r.t. Q1 FY'27

コンテンツ

Negative factors: adverse commodity prices in the context of the West Asia conflict, adverse foreign exchange movement, higher manufacturing overheads, higher depreciation due to a new facility and new model dies, lower non-operating income due to mark-to-market losses on invested surplus. Positive factors: improved realization, favourable Fixed Cost Incidence (FCI) due to inventory accretion, cost reduction efforts.

レイアウト構造

Same two-group bullet layout as page 7, with five negative and three positive bullets.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Gold square bullets
  • •Negative vs positive factor grouping
ページ 12
Section divider

Section Divider: H1 FY'27 w.r.t. H1 FY'26

コンテンツ

Section break introducing the half-year comparison of H1 FY'27 (April–September 2026) against H1 FY'26.

レイアウト構造

Centered three-line text stack inside the gold frame lines.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Centered large text
  • •Gold frame lines
ページ 13
Financial highlights / KPI table

Highlights of H1 FY'27 w.r.t. H1 FY'26

コンテンツ

Sales volume 1,379,378 vs 1,078,735 units (+27.9%); net sales INR 1,005,746 million vs 767,564 million (+31.0%); operating EBITDA 91,750 vs 97,054 (-5.5%); operating EBIT 54,354 vs 64,469 (-15.7%); PBT 75,071 vs 91,969 (-18.4%); PAT 57,670 vs 70,609 (-18.3%).

レイアウト構造

Same highlights table design with yellow header and arrow change column.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Yellow header table
  • •Green up arrows on volume and sales
  • •Red down arrows on profit lines
ページ 14
Data table / ratio comparison

Key Financial Ratios (% of Net Sales) – H1 FY'27 vs H1 FY'26

コンテンツ

Material cost 80.2% vs 75.1% (+510 bps); employee cost 4.8% vs 5.3% (-50); other expenses 11.1% vs 12.3% (-120); other operating income 5.2% vs 5.4% (-20); operating EBITDA 9.1% vs 12.6% (-350); depreciation 3.7% vs 4.2% (-50); operating EBIT 5.4% vs 8.4% (-300); interest 0.1% unchanged; non-operating income 2.2% vs 3.7% (-150); PBT 7.5% vs 12.0% (-450); PAT 5.7% vs 9.2% (-350).

レイアウト構造

Ratio table matching pages 6 and 10, with highlighted EBITDA and PAT rows, bps change column, red/green arrows and legend.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Highlighted rows
  • •Basis-point change column
  • •Red/green arrows
ページ 15
Data table / segment breakdown

Sales Volumes

コンテンツ

Total sales: domestic 588,535 units in Q2 FY'27 (+33.6% YoY, 84.5% of total) and 1,146,523 in H1 (+31.6%, 83.1%); exports 108,119 in Q2 (-2.1%, 15.5%) and 232,855 in H1 (+12.2%, 16.9%); total 696,654 (+26.5%) and 1,379,378 (+27.9%). Domestic segments in Q2: passenger cars (Mini, Compact, Mid-size) 281,308 (+31.9%, 47.8%), UVs 236,807 (+52.3%, 40.2%), vans 36,897 (+11.3%), LCV 10,441 (+23.5%), sales to other OEM 23,082 (-23.2%); H1 UVs 455,692 (+43.6%).

レイアウト構造

Two stacked tables with yellow two-tier headers (Q2 FY'27 and H1 FY'27, each with Number / YoY Growth % / share columns); vertical side labels 'Total Sales' and 'Domestic Sales'; bold total rows.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Two-tier yellow headers
  • •Rotated side labels
  • •Bold total rows
  • •Domestic vs export split
ページ 16
Closing slide

Thank You

コンテンツ

Closing slide with 'Thank You' centered.

レイアウト構造

Centered single line of text inside the gold frame lines.

主要な視覚要素

  • •Centered text
  • •Gold frame lines

よくある質問

このスライドと基礎となるプレゼンテーションコンテンツに関する一般的な質問。

What were Maruti Suzuki's Q2 FY27 headline results?

Per the deck, Q2 FY27 sales volume was 696,654 units (+26.5% YoY) and net sales were INR 506,155 million (+26.1%). Operating EBITDA fell 6.3% to INR 47,633 million and PAT fell 26.9% to INR 24,149 million, with the operating EBITDA margin at 9.4% versus 12.7% a year earlier.

Why did margins fall despite strong volume growth?

The company cites adverse commodity prices in the context of the West Asia conflict, adverse foreign exchange movement and lower non-operating income from mark-to-market losses on invested surplus. Material cost rose to 79.9% of net sales from 75.7%. Improved realization, operating leverage and cost reduction partly offset these.

What period does Q2 FY27 cover?

Indian companies use an April–March fiscal year, so FY27 runs from April 2026 to March 2027. Q2 FY27 covers July–September 2026 and H1 FY27 covers April–September 2026. The results were presented on 27 October 2026.

Where was this presentation published?

It is Maruti Suzuki India's standalone results presentation filed with BSE/NSE (the Indian stock exchanges). The exchange cover letter has been removed, leaving the 16-page presentation itself.

Why are the prior-year figures restated?

Suzuki Motor Gujarat (SMG), a wholly owned subsidiary, amalgamated with Maruti Suzuki India from 1 December 2025 with an appointed date of 1 April 2025, so financial statements for the relevant earlier periods were restated for comparison.

Which vehicle segments drove growth?

Utility vehicles grew fastest: 236,807 domestic UV units in Q2 FY27, up 52.3% YoY and 40.2% of domestic sales. Passenger cars rose 31.9% to 281,308 units, while exports dipped 2.1% to 108,119 units and sales to other OEMs fell 23.2%.

Can I download and edit this deck?

Yes. The page offers the original PDF and an editable PPTX converted from the PDF, so the tables and text can be adjusted in PowerPoint. Because it is a machine conversion, minor layout differences from the PDF are possible.

Is this a good template for my own quarterly results presentation?

It is a compact model: a highlights table, a ratio table with basis-point changes and red/green arrows, and a negative-vs-positive margin factors slide, repeated for YoY, QoQ and half-year comparisons, followed by a segment volume table. The clean white, gold and green design is easy to adapt.

出典・参考資料

2slides

Create Your Own Slides

Turn your ideas into professional presentations in seconds with 2slides AI.

数秒で世界クラスのスライドを作成

プロフェッショナルなデザインを参照し、スタイルを選択し、完璧なテキストレンダリングでスライドを生成。Nano Banana搭載—今すぐプレゼンテーションの作成を始めましょう。

2Slides logo

あなたのスライド用AIエージェント。インテリジェントなプレゼンテーション作成で時間を節約し、より速く輝きます。

AIで要約

ChatGPTClaudeGrokPerplexity
すべてのサービスは稼働中

製品

機能

ギャラリー

テンプレート

連携

リソース

比較

© 2026 2slides。全著作権所有。